Volley in hot water over sexualised #Grassroots ad campaign

New on our list of corporations that have exploited women are Volley with their recent #Grassroots campaign. Volley have been a popular shoe company for decades, but for some reason they got lazy and decided they were going to try the 'sex sells' method of advertising (which we know doesn't actually lead to more sales as detailed here).

Volley thought they would be 'cool' and 'edgy' so they made a video along with a series of posters with a bunch of young people in sexualised positions, focussing in on their body parts and objectifying them in the hope to sell their shoes. 

Screenshot_2016-10-24_15.17.07.png

They then sent an email to all their customers with a link to the video which included explicit full frontal nudity (...to sell shoes).

"The Board noted that in some scenes in the advertisement women are shown wearing only underpants and shoes and considered that the level of nudity is explicit. The Board noted the Practice Note to Section 2.4 which provides: “Full frontal nudity…is not permitted” and considered that the scenes showing the full breasts and nipples of female models are a clear breach of this Section of the Code."

"The Board noted that the advertised product is shoes and considered that there is a lot of focus on the bodies of the men and women in the advertisement as well as the products they are wearing. The Board noted in particular the focus on a woman’s breasts when she is on a swing, the close-up of a woman’s bottom when she leans in to a car, and the lingering shots of couples embracing, and considered that this focus increases the impact of the nudity and gives the advertisement a sexualised tone.

The Board noted that the advertisement was sent to the complainant as a customer of Volley shoes and considered that an advertisement showing high levels of nudity and sexualised activity has no relevance to the advertised product and is not something most customers of this type of shoe would expect to receive. Overall the Board considered that the advertisement did not treat the issue of sex, sexuality and nudity with sensitivity to the relevant audience of customers purchasing shoes.

The Board determined that the advertisement did breach Section 2.4 of the Code. Finding that the advertisement did breach Section 2.4 of the Code, the Board upheld the complaint."

In addition to the complaint regarding the video being upheld by the board, complaints regarding the posters in public places across Melbourne were also upheld as being a breach of the advertising code. 

Companies really need to start thinking outside the box and put the old 'sex sells' approach to rest. 

Whilst it is great that in this instance the Advertising Standards Board have upheld the complaint in most instances consumer complaints are dismissed.

Help us strengthen the advertising code of ethics and sign the petition today. Click here

To read the full Volley case report click here


Want to lend your voice?

Showing 3 reactions
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
icon

Recent Friends

You can defend their right to childhood

Everyday our young people are exposed to more brands continuing to sexualise girls and objectify women. You can bring change to this sexploitation, stop companies from degrading women and prevent its devastating effects on young people.

Donate Now

From Our Supporters

Join the Discussion