Last month Perth mum of four Lyn Swanson Kennedy paid for an independent review into an Ad Standards determination after the Community Panel gave the green light to a huge OnlyFans billboard at a busy intersection. The billboard created a stir of controversy with over 6000 people signing a petition for the land owner to have it removed. 

In its latest failure to protect community members from exposure to harmful, porn themed ads which objectify women, Ad Standards has ruled against its own panel members in defence of Playboy owned sex shop Honey Birdette’s shop window ad.

Honey Birdette's BDSM-porn themed ads found in breach of ad code of ethics [*Content warning]

Collective Shout's letter to KFC heads

Sexual objectification is not empowering

"The advertiser did not provide a response" (again)

Honey Birdette have shared their latest advertising campaign, set to coincide with the Sydney Mardi Gras festival. The campaign depicts an orgy, featuring naked men and women whose bodies are painted in the Pride colours. Many of the women included are headless, but their naked breasts made it into the frame (we've blurred the image below).

What’s the point of an advertising body which knocks back complaints before considering them?

In yet another display of inconsistent decision-making, the Ad Standards Community Panel has dismissed community complaints against a porn-inspired Honey Birdette ad.

Inconsistent rulings show ad industry self-regulation failure