• About
    About Our Team Board Members Ambassadors Partners
  • Campaigns
    Campaigns Wins Submissions Brands Age Verification
  • Join Us
    Join Us Events Become a CSR Pledge Partner
  • Request a speaker
  • Resources
    Resources Parents and Carers The Research Porn harms
  • News
    News Media Releases YouTube In the Media
  • Donate
Donate

Pages tagged "Clothing"


Kmart apologises, swiftly withdraws sexualised underwear for girls

Posted on News by Collective Shout · November 25, 2011 8:56 AM

In one of the fastest responses to consumer complaints that we’ve seen, Kmart has withdrawn a range of underwear with sexualised slogans and issued an apology assuring customers they will not repeat the same mistake.

Read more

Does the Human Rights Commission really care about gender equality?

Posted on News by Collective Shout · August 15, 2011 7:14 PM

One woman's battle against porno and violent fashion

Read more

Bras n Things wants you to be a Bunny

Posted on News by Collective Shout · July 27, 2011 7:31 AM

Does that include Hef's 9pm curfew?

Read more

Retailers urged to cease the sale and distribution of 'porn t-shirts'

Posted on News by Collective Shout · July 05, 2011 10:08 PM

*Trigger Warning - violence against women, sexual assault*

Read more

Supre's super sexualising campaigns

Posted on News by Collective Shout · May 30, 2011 11:14 PM

Collective Shout supporters have alerted us to Supre’s latest advertising campaign.

Read more

General Pants Co. 'censor' new ad campaign

Posted on News by Collective Shout · May 06, 2011 10:19 PM

We say get rid of it altogether

Read more

Rivers might be upset with us

Posted on News by Collective Shout · April 19, 2011 1:10 AM

Actually, we're pretty sure they are

We laughed out loud when a Collective Shout supporter sent us a scan of the latest Rivers Catalogue. Have they really created a catalogue cover just to have a go at us?

Read more

Complaints against Rivers '10 deadly deals' upheld by the ASB

Posted on News by Collective Shout · April 07, 2011 9:27 AM

[Update: complaints dismissed following appeal to independent reviewer]

Rivers.jpgComplaints against Rivers '10 deadly deals' catalogue cover have been upheld by the Advertising Standard Board.

Collective Shout had exposed Rivers eroticisation of violence against women last month after supporters found the catalogue included with their local newspaper.

Our supporters began writing to Rivers  and to the ASB to voice their objection to the use of violence against women as a marketing tool.

Read more

Anti-violence men's group takes on Rivers

Posted on News by Collective Shout · March 28, 2011 9:27 PM

As posted on Melinda Tankard Reist's blog.

How encouraging it is for those of us involved in trying to make things better for women and girls when men stand with us and want the same. Readers will remember when David Ould took on Loveable for its objectifying advertising. Now No To Violence Male Family Violence Prevention Association has taken on Rivers for glorifying violence against women in its advertising, confronting the company for being part of cultural support systems for violence against women. Here's their letter as posted to Collective Shout's site:

Read more

Rivers nailed for seeing dead women as new advertising opportunity

Posted on News by Collective Shout · March 24, 2011 8:43 PM

From Melinda Tankard Reist's blog

The Age has covered our protest against Rivers for appropriating the image of a dead woman in fishnet stockings and stilettos on the front of a catalogue headed "10 deadly deals" as described on the Collective Shout website and here. I was amused to see River's spokesman describe our interpretation of the catalogue cover as "weird and draconian".

So if we weren't meant to interpret the woman as being dead - murdered even - why the heading "10 deadly deals"? Is she merely under the couch searching for her missing purse? The damn remote? Or playing hide-and-seek badly? If she tripped and fell wouldn't the heading be '10 clumsy deals'? If we've got it so wrong, why doesn't Rivers tell us what they meant to convey with the image and wording?

the-age.jpgHere's Michelle Griffin's piece which also mentions some of our other actions against eroticised violence against women in advertising. We can't be blasé about this trivialisation of violence against women.

Read more

  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next →

A world free of sexploitation is possible!


You can defend their right to childhood

Your gift will fuel the fight

Give Today
  • Sign in with Facebook
  • Sign in with Twitter
  • Sign in with Email


Collective Shout

  • Home
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Join
  • Contact

Latest Campaigns

  • Honey Birdette
  • Etsy
  • Local Council
  • Hardie Grant
  • Cheeky Waffles

Trending Now

  • Perth billboard flogs OnlyFans porn subscriptions - Collective Shout
  • WIN: Twitter's mass child sex abuse doll takedown - Collective Shout
  • Sex abuse survivor condemns Lutheran company’s strip club investments and shuts daughter’s account - Collective Shout

Follow us on our socials

© 2023 Collective ShoutCreated with Heartburst
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
ACNC Registered Charity

Collective Shout is a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee and is governed by a board of directors. We are an independent registered charity with no affiliation to religious or political institutions.