Boys vulnerable to sex industry predation; school girls sexualised in schoolie promos

OnlyFans is a subscriber-only social media platform predominantly used to sell pornographic content. It is a form of online prostitution in which many women are harmed, a site of rape, sex trafficking, image-based sexual abuse and child sexual abuse.

We have documented how the platform puts women at risk and leaves them vulnerable to exploitation, with a growing number of young female content creators reporting degrading and violent requests, abusive and predatory treatment, as well as doxxing, non-consensual sharing of their videos and images, and stalking by male subscribers. We’ve also shared the account of former OnlyFans recruiter Victoria, who explained how she would approach young women and entice them to create pornographic content, and how she quit her job after witnessing what really happened to them.

It's true that many women are harmed, exploited, abused and traumatised on OnlyFans. It is also true that some individuals on OnlyFans are predatory and opportunistic, using a wide array of tactics to generate controversy to attract new subscribers.

Guest post by Caroline Pugh-Roberts

“There’s a massive pressure to do what you have to do.”

Collective Shout quoted in 10 Daily article

10 daily forwarded several photographs of Australian Instagram models aged between nine and 15 to Collective Shout. It's a grassroots campaigns movement against the objectification of women and the sexualisation of girls.

“I searched for a couple of images and found them on porn sites. It’s likely the majority of them are on porn sites and others are in a chat room with inappropriate sexual comments about a primary school aged girl,” campaigns manager Caitlin Roper said.

10 daily has viewed and can confirm that these images were shared on a porn site and other chat rooms.

But who should be held accountable for where these pictures are ending up?

Michael Murchie was the man behind the camera for at least one of the child photos Roper found a porn site. He told 10 daily all clothing in his shoots belong to the models.

When questioned about the age-appropriateness of the photos of teen and pre-teen girls such as the images above, Murchie said:

“I never take revealing photos of minors. I merely take the photos requested of me by the clients, their parents."

But Roper doesn't buy it.

“Is that an excuse? If a parent wants to exploit their kids then its OK from a photographer to make money from it?”

Girls and women's advocate Roper said modelling decision being made by parents could be damaging to their children in years to come.

Do they not understand the implications for their child or do they not care? Is it about fame ahead of their child’s rights and safety?” 

Read the full article at 10 Daily

Objectifying Christmas promotion turns heads; stomachs

We recently shared an article detailing a mother’s experience with her teenage daughter and an online swimwear company. Here's what happened next.

My 16 year-old’s first thong/G-string Bikini arrived today