Tell Rivers what you think of their new approach to advertising
[UPDATE] The Ad Standards Board has dismissed complaints - Read determination here.
We have received several emails from Collective Shout supporters about the latest Rivers Catalogue.
Comments we received include:
The girl's face appears to be very young. I thought the catalogue was very inappropriate for the merchandise --cheap sandals, lots of chidrens' wear.
With the tagline of 'Get Excited' with the image it is loaded with such sexual overtones that one could mistake your catelogue for a pornographic magazine.
It objectifies women. The photo on the front is clearly sexual in intention, and is not referenced in the inside catalogue, so it is only to attract attention. This is trading on women's sexuality and I am complaining about the trend in Rivers' advertising.
Curious, we looked at the list of determinations on the Advertising Standards Board's website to see if there have been complaints about Rivers before.
From December 2010 (Link to PDF)
Image of a person pulling on a pair of jeans. We can only see from the upper thigh to the middle of the back. The person is not wearing a top, and we can see the top of their bottom. The words "GET EXCITED" are written in black along the line of their back.
From May 2010 (Link to PDF)
Photograph of a female taken from the front. She is bent over with her legs apart, and her arms stretched above her so that her body shape resembles an X. She is wearing knee high black boots and black shorts. You can't see her face as she is looking at the floor and her hair is hanging down. The image is on the front cover of a Rivers Catalogue, entitled Red Hot.
From January 2010 (Link to PDF)
This print advertisement a catalogue cover for Rivers Australia summer sizzle 12 day sale shows a woman with long blonde hair sitting on a white box with her back to the camera. She is wearing a blue, white and red striped shirt. It is pulled down on her left shoulder revealing a red bra strap. No underpants are visible and her bottom is slightly exposed. Details about the sale are on both sides of the image.
Of course, as we have come to expect from the Advertising Standards Board, complaints about all of the above were dismissed. We can only assume that complaints about this most recent advertisement will be dismissed also.
However, it is still very important to register your complaint about Rivers advertising with the Advertising Standards Board. We need to make it clear that the objectification of women is something the community cares about, regardless of the ASB's determination on the matter.
We also need to let Rivers know what we think of their new approach to advertising. Previously they had adopted what could be seen as a radical approach to advertising. Instead of using traditional models, Rivers had used regular people:
It is amazing how things that come out of necessity get adopted. We couldn’t afford models at Rivers. So I roped anyone in, including staff, my brother-in-law even my children. When we did the first catalogue we got heaps of letters and phone calls from people in advertising telling us how unprofessional we were. But we got 10 times more from customers telling us they were fantastic and how great it was to see real people modelling. - Phillip Goodman, owner of Rivers quoted in Smart Company
Exchanging regular people as models and customer praise with semi-naked objectified women is a bad idea.
Contact the Advertising Standards Board here, via their online complaints form.
Owner of Rivers
Phillip Goodman P.O Box 7034 Hawthorn North
You might like to make the following points in your email to Rivers:
- You are not 'excited' by Rivers new approach to advertising, which objectifies women
- The objectification of women has a negative impact on the health and well being of women and girls
- You will not be shopping at Rivers until they stop objectifying women in their advertising.
As always, let us know what you write and if you get a response, via the comments below.